Accuracy
Are factual claims correct and appropriately qualified?
HUMAN REVIEW FOR AI-ASSISTED WORK
Attested by Humans is an initiative exploring independent human review of AI-generated and AI-assisted work — examining what holds up, what does not, and what still requires human judgment.
01 / WHAT IT MEANS
The goal is not to detect whether AI was used. The goal is to make human scrutiny visible: what was reviewed, against which criteria, what problems were found, and what judgment the reviewer reached.
02 / REVIEW DIMENSIONS
Are factual claims correct and appropriately qualified?
Are claims supported by credible, traceable sources?
Do the assumptions, logic and conclusions hold together?
Are material gaps, omissions or missing perspectives present?
Are uncertainty, limitations and AI involvement made clear?
Is the output actually suitable for the decision or use intended?
03 / THE OUTCOME
A stated review scope.
Scores where they add meaning.
Issues and uncertainty highlighted.
Recommendations for improvement.
A record of what was reviewed — and by whom.
04 / PRINCIPLE
Attested means a human reviewed a defined output against stated criteria and recorded an assessment. It does not imply authorship, infallibility, legal certification or blanket approval beyond the stated scope.
05 / NEXT
Review methods, attestation formats and early pilots are being developed.